James Ray has been charged with manslaughter in the deaths of three people who perished during the Sedona Arizona sweat lodge incident. This is very, very good news, in my opinion.
I'm a believer in the Law of Attraction, to be sure, but one of the Law of Attraction's teachings is that you take responsibility for your actions. Ray is trying to squirm his way around this, in my opinion, by saying that he takes responsibility but that he's not criminally guilty, which is a crock. In this case, "I'm responsible" means, "I'm guilty," for his part in those deaths.
If he REALLY believed in the Law of Attraction, this never would have happened, because he never would have so become disconnected with other people in his teachings with them that he ignored them in favor of his own ego-driven pursuits.
And now, he's really going to experience the Law of Attraction in all of its simplicity and directness. You can't "pretend" your way out of the Law of Attraction's results, and now he's going to learn that.
Showing posts with label wealth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wealth. Show all posts
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Bah, Humbug!
I'll say this clearly. I am not a Christian (although I respect my Christian friends' and relatives' beliefs as long as they don't "proselytize" all over mine ;-) ).
That said, what is it with "bah-humbugging" all over the greeting "Merry Christmas," anyway? So okay, Christians intend it as a recognition of Jesus' birth (even though the man wasn't really born then), and what of it?
You may call that "proselytizing," too, but you know? Whether or not it's meant that way, you don't have to take it that way. Plenty of other folks (me included) mean it as an innocuous, cheery greeting representative of the holiday itself: good feelings, good food and once-a-year treats, good times with friends and family, Christmas trees, having fun, presents and Santa, Rudolph's brave plight, all that.
So go on; relax already. And oh, yeah: Merry Christmas. :-)
That said, what is it with "bah-humbugging" all over the greeting "Merry Christmas," anyway? So okay, Christians intend it as a recognition of Jesus' birth (even though the man wasn't really born then), and what of it?
You may call that "proselytizing," too, but you know? Whether or not it's meant that way, you don't have to take it that way. Plenty of other folks (me included) mean it as an innocuous, cheery greeting representative of the holiday itself: good feelings, good food and once-a-year treats, good times with friends and family, Christmas trees, having fun, presents and Santa, Rudolph's brave plight, all that.
So go on; relax already. And oh, yeah: Merry Christmas. :-)
Friday, December 11, 2009
The Law of Attraction, James Ray, and Sedona
There's been a lot of press lately about this "The Secret" so-called "guru," James Ray, and the sweat lodge tragedy that happened in Sedona, Arizona under his watch; so far, three people have died from it and many more were injured. I've been following that with interest, because I'm a believer in the Law of Attraction, and of course that incident has given a lot of LOA detractors fuel for their fire. They say that we LOA believers will say that number one, the victims attracted this circumstance to themselves, and that number two, James Ray will simply get off scot free because he can simply ignore what happened and put his attention on "something else," thus making this "unpleasant" incident simply go away.
I think they're wrong. I do NOT believe that these victims "attracted" the situation to themselves so that they could die (and I do not believe the gag worthy statement someone said, that they were just "having so much fun in the nonphysical" that they didn't want to come back).
I DO believe these victims gave their power over to James Ray to such an extreme extent that they wouldn't even listen to their own bodies when their bodies screamed that they had to get out of that sweat lodge or perish. Instead, they listened to James Ray tell them that they had to do what HE said -- so much so that they continued to ignore their own well-being to the point where they died. Why did they give their own personal power up so much that they got themselves into that circumstance in the first place?
James Ray is even more responsible for what happened. If he really DID believe in the Law of Attraction, he would know that it's about personal responsibility and self-empowerment -- and that's what he would be teaching. Instead, he was telling these people that they had to listen to HIM, or be failures. Anybody who really believed in the Law of Attraction would be saying that these people should be listening to themselves first and foremost. (And actually, he does say that in what he writes; apparently, it's not part of his personal behavior, though.) He wouldn't be on an ego trip.
But that's what it was. It was a pure ego trip for him, in my opinion, which means that he's a charlatan. Because if you really believe in the Law of Attraction, you know that you have to be wary of your ego, and you have to keep an eye on it; you don't let it control you. You also know that you can't be a fake. You can't pretend to be one thing, but really be something else. That's because the Law of Attraction draws experiences to you based upon who you really *are*, not on who you "pretend" to be. And James Ray is living that out right now -- which is exactly what he deserves.
I think they're wrong. I do NOT believe that these victims "attracted" the situation to themselves so that they could die (and I do not believe the gag worthy statement someone said, that they were just "having so much fun in the nonphysical" that they didn't want to come back).
I DO believe these victims gave their power over to James Ray to such an extreme extent that they wouldn't even listen to their own bodies when their bodies screamed that they had to get out of that sweat lodge or perish. Instead, they listened to James Ray tell them that they had to do what HE said -- so much so that they continued to ignore their own well-being to the point where they died. Why did they give their own personal power up so much that they got themselves into that circumstance in the first place?
James Ray is even more responsible for what happened. If he really DID believe in the Law of Attraction, he would know that it's about personal responsibility and self-empowerment -- and that's what he would be teaching. Instead, he was telling these people that they had to listen to HIM, or be failures. Anybody who really believed in the Law of Attraction would be saying that these people should be listening to themselves first and foremost. (And actually, he does say that in what he writes; apparently, it's not part of his personal behavior, though.) He wouldn't be on an ego trip.
But that's what it was. It was a pure ego trip for him, in my opinion, which means that he's a charlatan. Because if you really believe in the Law of Attraction, you know that you have to be wary of your ego, and you have to keep an eye on it; you don't let it control you. You also know that you can't be a fake. You can't pretend to be one thing, but really be something else. That's because the Law of Attraction draws experiences to you based upon who you really *are*, not on who you "pretend" to be. And James Ray is living that out right now -- which is exactly what he deserves.
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
"Concrete" Law of Attraction
Abraham Hicks was my first introduction to LOA (Law of Attraction) more than 10 years ago now, and it was a whole new way to think. I kind of pooh-poohed it, but was also intrigued. Could it really be that easy? "Float your cork!" said Abe. "Reach for the better thought!"
Um, no. I mean, don't get me wrong, but learning LOA in human terms on this planet has meant, for me, the same kinds of struggle, skepticism, etc., I guess you'd expect when you completely change how you think. NOW I believe that things happen for a reason, that I'm pretty much responsible for what happens to me, and it's very empowering to realize that I'm never a victim of circumstance. But are there things I do differ with vs. Abe. For one, we're humans on this planet in these human bodies, and we must necessarily "filter" our experiences to at least some extent in that context. So sometimes, we can't just "feel better" and have things be miraculously okay. There will be loss, grief and struggle, and that's part of life, of this human experience we're all sharing.
That's where "concrete LOA" kicks in, for me. LOA can't completely protect me from the vagaries of life, but it CAN teach me how to see them and handle them. And it can also teach me to stay empowered, to stay present in the moment, and to sidestep those situations where I do have control and choice, but where I might have unwittingly let myself be a victim of circumstance before I knew about my own power and how to use it.
Um, no. I mean, don't get me wrong, but learning LOA in human terms on this planet has meant, for me, the same kinds of struggle, skepticism, etc., I guess you'd expect when you completely change how you think. NOW I believe that things happen for a reason, that I'm pretty much responsible for what happens to me, and it's very empowering to realize that I'm never a victim of circumstance. But are there things I do differ with vs. Abe. For one, we're humans on this planet in these human bodies, and we must necessarily "filter" our experiences to at least some extent in that context. So sometimes, we can't just "feel better" and have things be miraculously okay. There will be loss, grief and struggle, and that's part of life, of this human experience we're all sharing.
That's where "concrete LOA" kicks in, for me. LOA can't completely protect me from the vagaries of life, but it CAN teach me how to see them and handle them. And it can also teach me to stay empowered, to stay present in the moment, and to sidestep those situations where I do have control and choice, but where I might have unwittingly let myself be a victim of circumstance before I knew about my own power and how to use it.
Friday, December 4, 2009
New Lazy Law of Attraction blog
Hey, folks:
Lazy-law-of-attraction.com is just getting up and running, but I've just started this site (and blog) for folks who are interested in talking about the Law of Attraction in a more "lazy," laid back way. I want this site to be yours as much as it is mine, though this blog will mostly be my own "blathering," at least to start. ;-)
About me? I've studied the Law of Attraction for a long time and my first introduction to it was through Abraham-Hicks. I've loved a lot of Abe's approach, but thought it a bit "ethereal" at times. Not enough "in the physical," constructive advice.
Years on, I've found other resources that have also been helpful, but (just for me) have not wanted to focus as much on hype and "bling," "Look what I got!" and "YOU can be rich, too!," as many of the resources I've found have focused on.
Instead, I've always felt that yes, "enough" material subsistence is certainly necessary, IMO, to experience true freedom (if you're worried about paying rent, can you really relax and simply "be"?). But beyond that, what's with all the hype and all the focus on pretty, shiny things? What about conservation, helping Mother Earth survive, and being respectful of the environment, instead of mass consumption "just because"?
And I know; Abe (Abraham-Hicks) has said that whatever we want, we can have; the Earth will simply have the resources, and will provide, because we believe it can be so and will thus attract that experience.
Maybe that's true. But I would like to know if others feel, as I do, that there should be a certain respect inherent in practicing LOA; that just because we "can" have whatever "self"-based desires we want, maybe we practice some restraint, some compassion, some respect, and take care to honor ourselves, each other, the Earth, as part of LOA too.
I'd really like to know what you think, and that's why I started this blog, forum and website. Hope to get some good discussion going.
Best,
Kim
Lazy-law-of-attraction.com is just getting up and running, but I've just started this site (and blog) for folks who are interested in talking about the Law of Attraction in a more "lazy," laid back way. I want this site to be yours as much as it is mine, though this blog will mostly be my own "blathering," at least to start. ;-)
About me? I've studied the Law of Attraction for a long time and my first introduction to it was through Abraham-Hicks. I've loved a lot of Abe's approach, but thought it a bit "ethereal" at times. Not enough "in the physical," constructive advice.
Years on, I've found other resources that have also been helpful, but (just for me) have not wanted to focus as much on hype and "bling," "Look what I got!" and "YOU can be rich, too!," as many of the resources I've found have focused on.
Instead, I've always felt that yes, "enough" material subsistence is certainly necessary, IMO, to experience true freedom (if you're worried about paying rent, can you really relax and simply "be"?). But beyond that, what's with all the hype and all the focus on pretty, shiny things? What about conservation, helping Mother Earth survive, and being respectful of the environment, instead of mass consumption "just because"?
And I know; Abe (Abraham-Hicks) has said that whatever we want, we can have; the Earth will simply have the resources, and will provide, because we believe it can be so and will thus attract that experience.
Maybe that's true. But I would like to know if others feel, as I do, that there should be a certain respect inherent in practicing LOA; that just because we "can" have whatever "self"-based desires we want, maybe we practice some restraint, some compassion, some respect, and take care to honor ourselves, each other, the Earth, as part of LOA too.
I'd really like to know what you think, and that's why I started this blog, forum and website. Hope to get some good discussion going.
Best,
Kim
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
